Oct 09

Print this Post

The Mystery Woman of the Baltimore

Captain’s quarters of an 18th century sailing vessel, such as that in which the mystery woman was found. Photo by Audrey Smallman, 2018.


Every Halloween I discuss an international mystery, or an aspect of folklore such as the ghost stories of southeastern China. This year will be different, because I am going to do three posts dealing with mysteries or the supernatural. With this post, I want to discuss the strange ship the Baltimore, a mystery with threads that reach from Ireland to Canada, and from the United States to Barbados. In his book, Maritime Mysteries: Haunting Tales of Atlantic Canada, Roland H. Sherwood tells the story (pp. 24-29) of how the ship mysteriously appeared in Chebogue, Nova Scotia. The local people wondered where the brigantine had come from, and why no people were seen on deck, even though someone had apparently anchored the vessel. They called out to those aboard, but no answer came. When local men boarded the ship on December 5, 1735 they found signs of a struggle, including blood smeared all over the deck. But of the crew there was not a trace. Seemingly, every single crew member had vanished. And everything valuable had been stripped from the ship. Then they heard the moaning within the cabin. The door had been barricaded shut. What they imagined at this point can only be guessed. When they burst through the door they found a woman on the floor, who said that her name was Susannah Buckler. That was almost certainly a lie, although what the truth is remains uncertain even today. 


English: “Taken on the Spot by Capt. J. Hamilton of His Majesty’s 40th Reg’t of foot.” Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia. By Artist: John Hamilton [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The local men brought Susannah to Annapolis Royal (the capital of the colony), where in May of 1736 she met Lt. Governor Lawrence Armstrong, 1664-1739 (1). One can only imagine Armstrong’s confusion. How could the rest of the crew have disappeared? What had happened to the bodies? Why were there signs of such a terrible fight on the abandoned ship? There are different versions of what she said to him, but according to Sherwood she told Armstrong that she was the wife of the ship’s owner, and that the ship had anchored so that the vessel could take on fresh water (Sherwood, pp. 25). At this time the entire crew had been killed in an attack by the Mi’kmaq people (Sherwood, 25). Although a strange story, it seems that Armstrong initially took this assertion at least half-seriously, which was perhaps understandable. How else could an entire ship’s crew vanish? And who else could he talk to in order to learn what had truly happened? He released her, but she quickly disappeared, although there is evidence she went to Boston. But then she vanishes from history, and probably for a very good reason. The local leadership learned that the Baltimore had been a convict ship sailing from Ireland to Annapolis, Maryland, with prisoners from Dublin’s Newgate prison. The ship had sailed from Dublin on October 7, 1735, but there likely had been a mutiny. There had been perhaps 66 convicts on that ship (there are many different numbers given), as well as the crew, and now there was one person left alive, so far as anyone knew. The British colonial authorities immediately launched a intensive search for the elusive Buckler, and even reached out to their French enemies. But she was never seen again.

Mi’kmaq (First Nations peoples) at Tuft’s Cove settlement, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada. Nova Scotia Archives & Records Management [1] NSARM accession no. 1992-412 Photographic Advertising Album, 1871, p. 18 / neg. no.: N-0418. By Joseph S. Rogers, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

When I first read Sherwood’s account of the mystery I wondered if it could possibly be true. How could the entire crew of the ship disappear? How was it that only a single woman survived? What happened to all the bodies of the dead? Why was the woman barricaded inside the cabin? Who then had sailed the ship into the harbor? There had to have been someone else besides the woman, because the ship had been anchored, but she was barricaded in the cabin. Or did she sail the ship, and then barricade herself in after she arrived? How could she have vanished forever, despite the fact that diligent inquiries were made in a small, colonial world?

There were so many possibilities and questions. Was it truly a mutiny, or had the ship met with pirates? Most of all, what could have happened to all the people who had been the ship? It was hard to believe that the the men -for nearly all of them likely had been men, since that was the common case on convict ships- had died in the mutiny. But if they had survived where had they gone? If they had fled into the forest, every farmer and trader within a 100 miles would soon have known. But there were no stories of other survivors from that ill-fated ship, from the local First Nations or Acadian farmers. Could this story possibly be true?

A little digging on the internet soon revealed that the case had not only happened, but had left behind a rich historical record. The Calendar of State Papers, Colonial, from the period are online. On June 19, 1736 Armstrong wrote to describe his interview with the “one who calls herself Susannah Buckler. . . “ In his choice of words there is strong evidence that he doubted both her account and her identity. She told him that all but two of the eighteen sailors onboard had died during the voyage, and that when the ship washed ashore local Indians took the vessel. They carried her into the woods, and stole 1,600 pounds, a truly fabulous sum for the time. The Mi’kmaq also, she claimed, also took the boat’s merchandise. Again, Armstrong noted “. . . if her report be true. . . ” Armstrong also found it difficult to understand the deaths of her remaining crewmen: “From that circumstance of the boat, the two servants being afterwards found dead, as the two sailors are not to be found, we are not a little apprehensive of their being murdered.”

For this reason Armstrong sent along the woman’s deposition and began to make inquiries. According to Sherwood, they reached from the French governor in Louisbourg to the English governor in Boston. He reached out to the local Indians to recover the goods, and also sought to reclaim material from the boat that had been taken by a local man. His account ended with a denunciation of Romish priests and their influence in the area. If something was not done, “his Government will forever be insulted, and his British Subjects, if not murdered, robbed and molested.”

A View of the Plundering and Burning of the City of Grimross, 1758, New Brunswick. Thomas Davies, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

The online records also note the following resources, which were not digitized: “Susannah Buckler’s (sic.) deposition; the Deposition of George Mitchell; Charles Dentremon, of Pobomcoup, Nova Scotia, upon the affair of the Baltimore, 11th May, 1736; Examination in Council of Peter Landry of Pobomcoup as to what he had seen and heard concerning the Indians and the Baltimore. 8th June, 1736.” I have not seen these records, although I would be very curious to read them.

Interestingly, the last two sources were translated from the French. After all, this was before the beginning of the expulsion of the Acadians from Nova Scotia in 1755. The tensions between English authority and a French Catholic population shaped Armstrong’s comments. Could there be any evil, in his mind, that was not linked to the Catholic priests in some way? In any case, there is a plethora of historical documentation concerning this event, which also includes the minutes of council of Nova Scotia, May 4th to June 7th, 1736. More copies of records may also be found in the Nova Scotia archives online index, which document that an alleged ship’s log survived. 

The records also indicate that the local Indigenous peoples stated that when they found the ship all the people were dead, which contradicted the woman’s claims that there had been two other survivors. Instead, they stated that they had found eight people dead upon the shore, including a woman far along in pregnancy (2). So who had killed these people, if they did not die of disease, starvation or thirst? If it was the convicts, where had they disappeared to? And why had they left only this single woman alive? As for the ship, it apparently been destined for the Chesapeake Bay area of the United States, before its ultimate destination of Barbados.

A period map marked with the site of the 1711 Quebec Expedition naval disaster. 1733. From the Boston Public Library digital map collection: http://maps.bpl.org/details_14080/ Call Number: G3400 1732 .M65. Herman Moll [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

On November 23 Armstrong wrote to the Council of Trade and Plantations. After talking further about his troubles with the priests, he talked about how the brigantine Baltimore had been brought into port. As for Susannah Buckler, Armstrong no longer believed her account or her ostensible identity. Indeed, Armstrong had a very different understanding of what had taken place: “It’s reported that the vessel aforesaid sailed from Dublin last fall with about sixty or seventy passengers most of them convicts, who it is supposed rose upon the owner Mr. Buckler, the Master and Company and committed a most barbarous massacre, and afterwards not knowing their course, or afraid to enter into any place where they might be known put in to a most unfrequented harbour in this Bay where they all perished (God knows how) except that miserable woman who perhaps was too deep involved in the guilt to discover the true story of their misfortunes.” (This letter is also printed in the following work: Murdoch, 518; Armstrong’s letter to the Duke of Newcastle of November 23, 1736).

Ironically, according to records from the time the mystery woman’s story unraveled when the real Susannah Buckler (Gwenda Morgan and Peter Rushton, 339) wrote to Armstrong searching for her husband (3). Sherwood states (pp. 28) that Armstrong told the council “She is not only an adventuress, but a splendid liar as well.” Sherwood also says (p. 29) that Armstrong never recovered the cargo ransacked from the ship. In the end, Armstrong seems to have sent the woman to New England before he uncovered the truth. Indeed, he wrote the Governor of Massachusetts that she was coming, according to one excellent academic study of this event (Gwenda Morgan and Peter Rushton, 339). One can only imagine his surprise when he learned the truth about Mrs. Buckler; for all his suspicions, it must have been a moment rather like the end of the film “The Usual Suspects.”

If you look up into this rigging, you can see why it seems unlikely any of the convicts could have sailed this ship any great distance. It would take a great deal of experience and skill to climb this rigging and manage these sails. Picture yourself having to climb these ropes in order to furl the sails, before the ship could be anchored. Ship’s rigging, Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum. Photo by Audrey Smallman, 2018

So what do we truly know? Despite Morgan and Rushton’s work many questions remain. What happened to most of the crew? Did they die fighting during a mutiny? Or did they kill each other in internal battles, after which the few survivors fled into the woods of Nova Scotia? And was Armstrong’s understanding of events in fact accurate? How then could all of the valuables from the ship have disappeared, and where did they go, and with whom? Finally, what was the real identity of the mystery woman? Was Sherwood correct (p. 29) that she had been one of the convicts aboard the ship, and if so is it possible to establish her identity?

Some people have suggested that her true name was Mrs. Matthews, and that she had been a prostitute in Dublin, Ireland (Conlin, 76), based on newspaper reports from the time (4). Supposedly Matthews was famous for a fight with another woman who wanted to claim her dead husband’s body. According to a newspaper account, she had been arrested for theft (Gwenda Morgan and Peter Rushton, 340), which -if correct- probably explains why she had been sent to the colonies. There also is a record that she was referred to as “Dowdy” after she left Nova Scotia, so that also might have been her true name (Morgan and Rushton, 341). There is evidence that after leaving Nova Scotia she passed through Boston (Gwenda Morgan and Peter Rushton, 340). But where did she go to next, and what kind of life did she make for herself there? It’s remarkable that she escaped not only the bloodshed on the ship, but also the hunt by the authorities. How could someone so notorious disappear, when every sailor in every port must have been fascinated by the story? The evidence is that she did reach Boston, but I cannot imagine how she evaded the authorities there. Certainly Armstrong made inquiries within the colonies, and the newspapers carried the story. And yet she vanished, and with her the truth of what happened on that strange voyage.

“Brigantine Amazon entering Marseilles in November 1861. In 1868 she was renamed Mary Celeste. By Unconfirmed, possibly Honore Pellegrin (1800–c.1870). This speculative attribution is suggested in Paul Begg: Mary Celeste: The Greatest Mystery of the Sea. Longmans Education Ltd, Harlow (UK) 2007. Plate 2 (Scanned from Slate magazine, December 6 2011)” [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

While the story of the Mary Celeste (which was itself built in Nova Scotia) is much more famous, to my mind this story may be the strangest maritime mystery in Atlantic Canada. Indeed, it’s peculiar that this story seems to have been nearly forgotten, as it reads like a historical thriller. It’s equally puzzling as some stories of ghost ships that are part of popular folklore, such as the discovery of the Caroll A. Deering off North Carolina in 1921. Yet to the best of my knowledge there has never been a book written about this mystery. Neither are there any poems, novels or films about the mystery of the Baltimore, or at least none that I have come across.

Nova Scotia is home to many historical riddles, such as Jerome of Sandy Cove, another mystery person found on the ocean’s edge. Such odd occurrences continue to take place in the Maritimes, such as 2010 rocket firing in the ocean off of Newfoundland. There are also many strange stories about the contemporary North Atlantic, so these mysteries are not confined to the distant past. Nova Scotia is justly famous for a its wonderful seafood and scenic beauty. But its always been a place rich in folklore and mystery, which is easy to forget when you are seeing the scenery at Peggy’s Cove, or eating the lobster at Ryer’s.

As for Lt. Governor Lawrence Armstrong, he seems to have led a tragic life. Just like the mysterious Mrs Matthews, his family also had an Irish background. After fighting in Europe, he was sent with Admiral Hovenden Walker’s expedition against Quebec. Walker’s expedition had been intended to seize Quebec from the French, but the campaign ended after navigation errors led many ships to wreck, a mistake that cost over 700 lives. Armstrong’s ship was amongst those lost. According to his record in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography, Armstrong was sent from Quebec to Annapolis Royal. After suffering a life of poverty, debt and privation, he rose to the rank of Lt. Governor. The position seems to have brought him little happiness, as he entered into endless conflicts with Governor Philipps. A sensitive man, he was humiliated by a merchant before his men who were drawn up on a parade ground, although it’s unknown when this event occured (Murdoch, 529). One historian, Murdoch (p. 529) listed Armstrong’s failure with Buckler amongst the litany of Armstrong’s misfortunes before his death. He committed suicide at Annapolis Royal -the same place that he had arrived after the shipwreck, and from which he had worked to administer the colony- on December 6, 1739, four years after the ship the Baltimore was discovered. Unpopular and ill, he likely killed himself with his own sword, which his officers found lying beside him on his bed. It may have taken him some time to complete the act, because they found five bloody wounds on his chest. It is strange that he chose to die almost four years to the day after that strange ship was first found.

B&W photography of Jerome of Sandy Cove, Nova Scotia. 20 April 1912, By the Daily Echo [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

I know of no later memoir that would recount his own version of the Baltimore’s discovery and his search for the vanished crew. Still, local accounts or traditions of this event perhaps survived. Sherwood stated (pp. 27) that the local residents in Annapolis feared the ship so much that it lay untouched for seven years. Finally, after all this time Armstrong ordered the ship to be towed out into the harbor and burned. The ship in fact may have been burned after this length of time, but if this took place in 1743 then Armstrong had been dead for four years. This narrative may also capture the aura of fear that surrounded the “Death Ship,” which was so abhorred that the ship never sailed again, at least in popular memory. One can imagine the value of a ship in a small, colonial sea-faring community. How much fear must have surrounded that ship in order for the authorities to burn it, instead of selling it or giving it away? Was there truly nobody in the entire community who petitioned colonial leaders to be granted the ship? No crony of a colonial leader who would not have wanted to obtain it so that they could make their fortune in trade? Why wasn’t it returned to the real Susannah Buckler, or sold and the money sent to her?

One can only imagine the folklore that must have circulated around this event amongst the Acadian population. Perhaps these memories and folklore traveled south with them after their expulsion after 1755, a little over a decade after this ship was burned. Did versions of these stories get told in an old plantation on the Louisiana delta, while the mists wafted through the family cemetery out back? And if so, did they tell stories about why the local people had so feared the ship that authorities chose to set fire to it? Did they believe that the ship was haunted? And where did the woman who called herself Susannah Buckler escape to?

Coastal navigation along a rocky shore would have been highly dangerous for inexperienced sailors who lacked a captain. The ship was also found in December in Atlantic, Canada, when the weather was unlikely to have been as pleasant as in this picture. Imagine the numerous rocky shoals that could puncture a hull at low-tide without skillful navigation. Ganges Harbour, Salt Spring Island, B.C., 2018. Photo by Shawn Smallman

It’s easy to imagine her taking on a new identity, and leaving the names of Matthews/Dowdy/Buckler behind. Ireland would have likely been too dangerous to return to, and it’s hard to see how she could have afforded a trip across the Atlantic. People at the time would sign themselves into indentured servitude for seven years to pay for the crossing. It perhaps seems more likely that she traveled on foot. Did she leave for another colony, and wind up a barmaid in Virginia, or a farm servant in Maryland, where she lived a quiet life? Did she marry a rich merchant, and found a respectable and wealthy dynasty? Or did she commit other crimes, for which she was punished under other names? Did she ever tell her memories of what happened on that cursed ship, or did she take that story -and how she managed to escape the authorities- to the grave?

According to one online source that I found she managed to escape to London before disappearing, which the best source on the topic also states (Morgan & Rushton, 340); another online source said that she had traveled to Annapolis, Maryland, but provides no evidence. One can imagine that her odds for vanishing successfully would have been greatest in a metropolis like London, where she perhaps could have returned to her old ways. Whatever the truth, she seems to have vanished from both authorities and the historical record so successfully that it seems unlikely that we will ever learn the truth. Still, the mystery woman is the most interesting part of the affair. Why did she pretend to be Susannah Buckler? Was she only trying to avoid being sent back to jail? Or was she perhaps trying to claim the value of the ship, after her supposed husband’s death? One thing is certain- this woman was a remarkable survivor and liar.

I also wonder about the real Susannah Buckler too, whose husband Andrew Buckler died on that voyage. Her maiden name was Susannah Marshall. She had married her husband on May 23, 1720 in Dublin, when she was 24 years old. Did she ever learn more about what truly happened on that trip? Did stories circulate that were never recorded in the official records, and which made it to her ears? According to one website that I found, Andrew Buckler -the captain of the Baltimore- was 41 when he died (born in Dublin, Ireland on November 3, 1694). He and Susannah had four children: John, Samuel, Stephen and Robert. Were any traditions passed down in this family about their father’s loss? In the end, Susannah Buckler had a long life and died in 1760, although the place of her death is unknown. I like to think that despite this tragedy, she and her husband now have descendants everywhere from Ireland to Barbados.

I have a couple of ideas about this story, and several questions. First, I wonder if there might have been another ship

In addition to lacking sailing skills, the convicts would have been unlikely to have had the navigation knowledge -or basic literacy- to use the ship’s charts for blue water sailing. Old chart, Boston Tea Party Ships and Museum. Photo by Audrey Smallman, 2018.

involved in the events somehow. How else could all the goods have been taken away, unless the local people had seized them, as Armstrong believed? We do know that the Indigenous people had copies of legal documents, but that is all that I have found reference to, so what happened to them? But if there were such a ship, whose could it have been? And second, I wonder if the mystery woman didn’t have a friend in Boston. Is that why she wanted to go there? As skilled a liar as she proved to be, how else could she have vanished in an unfamiliar world unless she had some help? Was there an Irish household somewhere in Massachusetts where she knew that she would be welcomed, and her presence hidden? Of course, according to Morgan and Rushton (340) Governor Armstrong had himself given her a letter to a friend in Boston, whom he had asked to give her twenty pounds. So perhaps she didn’t need any other support.

In addition, I think that the eight dead people that the Mi’kmaq said that they are found on the shore are an important clue, as the Indigenous testimony to me seems the most reliable that we have about this case, at least for the archival documents that I have been able to view online. It seems to me unlikely that these people were dead when they arrived on the ship. After all, someone could have easily disposed of them at sea. Why keep the bodies until you reached land? If so, the people most likely were murdered when they reached shore. Was this the ship’s crew? It seems unlikely that they could have all been killed by the mystery woman. So probably more than one person likely killed them there. Where did the murderers then go? Why did they leave this woman behind? Did she barricade herself into the cabin to protect herself from the killers? To me, it seems difficult to understand these events unless there were multiple people in another ship involved. But I doubt that we’ll ever know what truly happened, and this is all only supposition. Then again, I’ve only reviewed the documents that I could find online, but there are still more records in the archives, perhaps even including the alleged ship’s log. So this blog post’s version of the story is incomplete.

I’ve talked about this history with some family members who have a couple of thoughts of their own on this case. First, perhaps the mutiny took place only after the sailors had anchored the ship to take on water. So perhaps that was the one true thing that the mystery woman said. After all, in some ways this scenario seems to be the most likely one. Would the convicts have known how to furl the sails and set the anchor? Perhaps the crew let out the convicts from below decks to help move the water barrels or row the skiff to shore. The convicts could have seen the land, and known that this was their one chance to escape. Afterwards, perhaps they realized that they could not manage the sailing ship, so they tried to row away. If the inexperienced sailors tried to navigate coastal waters in the Bay of Fundy during a rising tide, that might explain the disappearance of many men. After all, the 1711 Walker expedition in Quebec showed again that a navigation error could quickly destroy many ships with a catastrophic loss of life. The tides in the Bay of Fundy are so huge as to seem to be unbelievable unless someone has seen them first hand.

My family member’s second thought was that the mystery woman seems to have known enough about Susannah Buckler to have been able to emulate her rather well. Who could have told her so much about Susannah and their business except the captain himself? So they wondered if the two of them had formed a relationship before the uprising, which enabled her to learn a great deal of background information about this man, his wife, and his business. Of course, the woman might have learned all that she needed from a member of the crew. Still, it seems unlikely that she could have pulled off this charade convincingly -even for an excellent liar- without a great deal of information. The captain would have been the best source for this knowledge.

Lastly, there is the Wikipedia entry for Susannah Buckler. It says that some of the mutineers were tried in Salem, Massachusetts, although the link it gives to support this assertion is broken. The entry also doesn’t say whether the men were convicted.  So perhaps buried in the judicial records from colonial Massachusetts there is an account of the true events in this story, or at least an alternative version that does not rely on the mystery woman’s word. After all, how could such a strange case not have a tie to Salem? Or Arkham.

Would you like to learn more about another Nova Scotian mystery? Read my review of Haunted Girl here, or Roland Sherwood’s wonderful book, which is filled with similar stories. I wish that I could have met Sherwood myself. You also can read my own book on a very old and evil spirit being in Algonquian belief: Dangerous Spirits: The Windigo in Myth and History. The book has its own accounts of the Chenoo, the Mi’kmaw name for the windigo, from narratives recorded in the 19th century in Nova Scotia. It also has its own stories of haunted waters (pp. 33-34, 53-54) but these are mostly not of the ocean, but rather the lakes and rivers of both Canada and the United States. If you do read it, please leave a review -good or bad- on Amazon or GoodReads.

Happy Halloween everyone, and if you are taking out children to trick or treat, please remember reflectors and glow sticks.

Shawn Smallman, 2018


  1. Sherwood also says (pp. 26) that the mystery woman appeared before the colony’s council on July 18, 1736. This date may be correct (I have not checked the council records for that date), but she had also clearly been already examined by Armstrong at least a month before.

2. Sherwood had access to sources that I have not seen. In his account (p. 29), however, the mystery woman was the only female among 59 male convicts. This information, however, seems to be contradicted by the Indigenous testimony to which Armstrong refers. In their account, a pregnant woman lay amongst the eight dead people that they found on the shore.

3. Morgan, Gwenda, and Peter Rushton. “Fraud and Freedom: Gender, Identity and Narratives of Deception among the Female Convicts in Colonial America.” Journal for Eighteenth‐Century Studies 34, no. 3 (2011): 335-355. This work is the only academic study of this case of which I am aware. Based on the newspaper account quoted in this article, Ms. Matthews -if that was the mystery woman’s true name- did not say that the Mi’kmaq had stormed the ship and slaughtered the crew. Indeed they appear to have cared for her well after taking her ashore, and made sure that she was brought to local Acadian settlers (p. 340). I am unaware of any evidence that they took valuables from the ship (apart from legal documents) although Armstrong seems to have believed this to be true, at least initially.

4. For a more recent summary of this case see the following work, pages 75-76. Conlin, Dan. Pirates of the Atlantic: robbery, murder and mayhem off the Canadian east coast. Formac Publishing Company Limited, 2009.

Murdoch, Beamish. A history of Nova-Scotia, or Acadie. Vol. 1. J. Barnes, 1865. For the unhappy events before Armstrong’s death see p. 529. For the letter to the Duke of Newcastle regarding the true events on the Baltimore see p. 518.

For one version of the story of the Carroll A. Deering, a ghost ship that foundered off of North Carolina, see the following: Whedbee, Charles Harry. Legends of the Outer Banks and Tar Heel Tidewater. Winston-Salem: John F. Blair. 1966. pp. 121-134.

Deck of sailing ship model, New Bedford Whaling Museum, MA. Photo by Audrey Smallman, 2018.


Permanent link to this article: https://www.introtoglobalstudies.com/2018/10/the-mystery-of-the-baltimore/